WASHINGTON — The U.S. House passed legislation on Friday that would give the federal government broader authority to police voting rights violations across the country.
The bill, a top priority for House Democrats, passed by a vote of 228-187, with just one Republican — U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-1st District, — breaking GOP ranks to vote for the measure. U.S. Rep. Matt Cartwright, D-8th District, was marked as not voting, according to an official House roll call.
The vote “is the most important non-violent instrument or tool we have in a democratic society and people should be able to use it, all of our citizens,” Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., said ahead of the vote. “There are forces in America today trying to take us back to another time and another place. But with the passage of this bill, we’re not going back, we’re going forward.”
Friday’s vote came as House Democrats hope to show they can continue to legislate even as they barrel ahead with an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. But like most of their top priorities this Congress, the voting rights bill faces steep Republican opposition and is likely to go nowhere in the GOP-led Senate.
Still, supporters of the bill hope to put political pressure on senators, and the legislation could be teed up again after a power shift in Congress or the White House.
“We should not let it languish in the Senate’s legislative graveyard,” U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the lead sponsor of the Senate version of the bill said Friday at a news conference. “Bring it to a vote, see if anybody would actually stand up and vote no.” Leahy’s bill has 43 Democratic and two independent co-sponsors.
The legislation, titled the Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019, comes in response to a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case Shelby County v. Holder.
The court “effectively struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by a 5-to-4 vote, freeing nine states, mostly in the South, to change their election laws without advance federal approval,” The New York Times wrote at the time.
Critics of the ruling say it has led to an uptick in voter suppression across the country and made it more difficult to enforce fair access to the ballot box.
“As soon as that decision was released, we began to see in state after state a torrent of voter suppression,” House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., said Friday.
The legislation that passed by the House, spearheaded by Rep. Terri Sewell, D-Ala., would set new criteria for determining which areas have had a recent history of voter discrimination and therefore must get federal approval before making changes to their voting practices.
If enacted, the legislation would require 11 states to require federal approval for changes to state voting laws, according to its sponsors. The 11 states are: Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.
House Republican opponents of the bill warned that the legislation would unnecessarily limit state and local control over voting.
“Full protections are afforded under the current federal law for all those with valid claims of discrimination in voting,” said Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga. He called the legislation a “partisan bill … to prevent states from running their own state and local elections.”
Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) said her home state “really has suffered under the Supreme Court decision of 2013. After that ruling, then-Governor Scott Walker — someone I’ve been fighting since 1990 to prevent him from acting an onerous voter ID law — he prevailed in 2016.”
Moore cited a University of Wisconsin-Madison study showing that between 12,000 and 23,000 registered voters in Madison and Milwaukee were deterred from voting by the voter ID law. Trump won the state by fewer than 23,000 votes. “It’s important and imperative that we restore enforcement of the Voting Rights Act,” Moore said.
U.S. Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-4th District, a “yes” on the bill, wrote on Twitter that she supported it because it [stops] the most egregious voter suppression tactics & move us closer to restoring the Voting Rights Act to its full strength.”
U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans, D-3rd District, the only Pennsylvania member of the Congressional Black Caucus, was a “yes” vote on the bill. He wrote on Twitter Friday that the bill “finally restore[s] the full strength of the Voting Rights Act, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision gutted it, unleashing a flood of voter suppression laws.”
Leahy warned that voter suppression is “alive and well today. … Maybe the water cannons and clubs and police dogs may have been replaced, but they’re replaced by bogus ID requirements, the purging of voter rolls, the changing of voter places. The tactics may have evolved, but the goal, don’t forget the goal: state sponsored systematic disenfranchisement. It remains the same.”